54 of 2010 on Procurement of Government Goods and Services (e-procurement) and its solution. 54 of 2010 on Procurement of Government Goods and Services (e-procurement), to explain constraints in the implementation of procurement auction policy of goods and services in Kabupaten Sukoharjo after the issuance of Presidential Regulation No.

This article aims to describe the implementation of procurement auction policy of goods and services in Sukoharjo before and after the Presidential Regulation No. Thus, the agreement of the director’s attorney made by the two defendants is null and void.

However, the agreement they made is not necessarily considered valid because the agreement of the director's attorney made by the two defendants including the nominee agreement in the procurement of government goods/ services is a matter which is not allowed to be carried out by business actors as the provider moreover, it can be considered as an attempt to smuggle the law because it is considered not to fulfill one of the legal requirements of the agreement namely the existence of a cause or causal that is lawful and considered to be contrary to the principle of good faith in the agreement. If it is associated with Article 13 of the Civil Code, legal relations between grantor and grantee of director’s attorney are created when they have agreed to enter into an agreement. The research results lead to one conclusion. This study is a normative study that uses legislative, case, and conceptual approaches and uses primary and secondary legal materials. This study aims to determine the legal relations between grantor and grantees of director’s attorney in the procurement of goods/ services based on the decision of the Mataram District Court Number: 33//2015/PN.MTR.

Cara membuat file tpk